Genetic technology is advancing, and critics are warning of a slippery slope. We spoke with the scientists working at the forefront of the research, families who have benefited and the first-ever “test-tube” baby to understand the debate.
Where the Debate Over "Designer Babies" Began
Producers: Jennifer Oko and Miriam Weintraub
Associate Producers: Noah Madoff and Olivia Katrandjian
Editor: Anne Checler
From the moment that scientists started tinkering with human embryos outside of the womb, there have been ominous outcries that we are on a slippery slope. People feared the technology would lead us towards a future where genetic modification of human beings is the norm. Babies would no longer simply be conceived and born, they would be designed. 40 years after the birth of the first so-called “test tube baby,” embryo selection and gene editing technologies offer great hope to couples looking to prevent hereditary disease or improve fertility. But with that progress comes a reignited concern that we are closer to slipping down the slope to designer babies than ever before. Are these fears warranted…or overblown?
Transcript
More Like This
AIDS: From Ryan White to Today's Silent Epidemic
While H.I.V. rates have fallen in many places, the AIDS crisis remains in some of the U.S.
Lessons From the Challenger Tragedy
Normalization of deviance, the process of becoming inured to risky actions, is a useful concept that was developed to explain how the Challenger disaster happened.
The Surprising Legacy of the Boy in the Bubble
Newborns today are tested for genetic and immune disorders that might not be apparent at birth. The tests evolved from the treatment of a patient with a rare diagnosis who became known as “the Boy in the Bubble.”
Could We Geoengineer Ourselves Out of Climate Change?
Is geo-engineering the climate an answer to global warming? Cold War science has some lessons.