Genetic technology is advancing, and critics are warning of a slippery slope. We spoke with the scientists working at the forefront of the research, families who have benefited and the first-ever “test-tube” baby to understand the debate.
Where the Debate Over "Designer Babies" Began
- Producers:
- Jennifer Oko
- Miriam Weintraub
- Associate Producers:
- Noah Madoff
- Olivia Katrandjian
- Editor:
- Anne Checler
From the moment that scientists started tinkering with human embryos outside of the womb, there have been ominous outcries that we are on a slippery slope. People feared the technology would lead us towards a future where genetic modification of human beings is the norm. Babies would no longer simply be conceived and born, they would be designed. 40 years after the birth of the first so-called “test tube baby,” embryo selection and gene editing technologies offer great hope to couples looking to prevent hereditary disease or improve fertility. But with that progress comes a reignited concern that we are closer to slipping down the slope to designer babies than ever before. Are these fears warranted…or overblown?
Transcript
More Like This
How Fear of the Measles Vaccine Took Hold
Skepticism and fear surrounding vaccines were fed by a flawed study done in 1998 linking the MMR vaccine to autism. The study was quickly discredited, we’re still dealing with the repercussions.
LSD Gets Another Look
LSD has long been associated with 1960s counterculture. Today, psychedelic drugs are back in the lab, providing hope for people who suffer from anxiety, depression and addiction.
Thalidomide: Return of an Infamous Pill
How a pill that led to drug safety guidelines became a case study for rising drug prices.
Are Robots Really Taking Over?
Humans are wary that robots could replace them. So what can we learn from the legendary chess match between a supercomputer and Garry Kasparov?