The War on Drugs: The New Face of HeroinOverview
This 14-minute video provides students with historical context that explains how the United States committed to a multi-decade war on drugs that resulted in mass incarceration and racially unequal outcomes in the criminal justice system. State and federal governments responded to a heroin epidemic in the late 1960s with a punitive response to drug addiction that disproportionately affected racial minorities. That approach has grown increasingly unpopular as more white Americans have become addicted to opioids. Useful for lessons focused on racial equality and criminal justice reform in recent history, the video sets up an engaging class discussion on how historical context affects our perceptions of race and crime.
- How heroin use in the late 60s and early 70s led many politicians to call for a war on drugs that focused on punishment.
- How the war on drugs led to mass incarceration and racially unequal outcomes in the criminal justice system.
- How the widespread misuse of prescription drugs among white Americans led to a reconsideration of treatment-oriented approaches to managing drug abuse.
- Social Studies
- U.S. History
- AP Psychology
- Cultural and Social Change
- Richard Nixon
- War on Drugs
- Criminal Justice
- 1960s America
- 1970s America
- The Modern Era (1980-Present)
- Race in America
- Ronald Reagan
Introducing the Lesson
In the late 1960s, America’s inner cities were hit by a wave of crime triggered by heroin users seeking drug money, leading politicians to get tough.
In New York, Gov. Nelson Rockefeller backed some of the harshest laws in the nation. They mandated incarceration up to life for anyone caught selling more than an ounce of heroin.
The so-called Rockefeller drug laws were adopted in states across the nation, sending the clear message that the growing drug problems were best handled with more police, more prisons and longer sentences.
The message was echoed through President Richard M. Nixon’s war on drugs, and grew louder under President Ronald Reagan, as crack cocaine use surged.
But while the jails and prisons were filling up, proposed solutions that treated addiction as a public health problem were ignored, despite some promising results.
That only began to change in the 2010s, after heroin addiction surged again as a consequence of widely available and addictive prescription opioids. Overdose deaths quadrupled from 1999 to 2015.
Suddenly the typical heroin user was white, young, middle class and often from a rural area, where the opioid crisis had hit hardest.
As the profile of heroin users changed, so too did addiction treatment. Illicit drug use was no longer viewed as a crime but an illness that could be treated with medications like Vivitrol.
- In the early 1970s, what were the different approaches taken by New York and Washington to control heroin? In the decades that followed, which of these approaches did the United States pursue?
- How did the public’s perception that heroin was an inner-city problem affect the way politicians and voters chose to respond to problems created by heroin use?
- By 1990, what category of criminal offenders constituted the largest portion of inmates?
- How did the widespread misuse of prescription drugs change the demographics of heroin abuse, and also change the government’s approach to the war on drugs?
- What effect does the prescription drug Vivitrol have on opioid dependence?
- What does the government’s changing approach to the war on drugs reveal about racial politics in the United States?
- Should drug dependence be treated as a criminal justice problem, or as a public health problem? What are the costs and benefits of each approach?
- If a friend or family member was struggling with addiction, would you want that person to be imprisoned, or would you want them put into a treatment program? Why?
- Do you think a war on drugs would have been launched if the heroin crisis of the 1970s had primarily affected white people?
Analyze a complex set of ideas or sequences of events and explain how specific individuals, ideas, or events interact or develop over the course of a text.
Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, as well as in words) in order to address a question or solve a problem.
Analyze multiple and complex causes and effect of events in the past.
Evaluate public policies in terms of intended and unintended outcomes, and related consequences.
Skill 4.B: Explain how a specific historical development or process is situated within a broader historical context.
Theme 5: Politics and Power (PCE).