Election of 1860: Slavery Splits the Democrats
- Analyze and assess the causes and consequences of the division within the Democratic Party over the issue of slavery that led to its defeat in the presidential election of 1860.
- Summarize, compare and contrast, and draw logical inferences from primary source documents regarding the 1860 election.
- Collaborate with peers in pairs and/or small groups to discuss, analyze, and assess text and visual primary source documents.
- Develop a position and present a viewpoint based on historical evidence.
- Civics & Government
- U.S. History
- 19th Century
- Campaigns and Elections
- Cultural and Social Change
- Political Parties
- Civil War
- Abraham Lincoln
- Stephen Douglas
Political scientist V.O. Key introduced the concept of critical elections into the study of voter behavior in 1955. Key’s main argument was that certain elections result in a set of sharp changes in party ideology, issues, party leaders, regional and demographic bases of power. The election of 1860 is one of these critical elections. It ushered in a period of Republican Party dominance between 1860-1912.
The 1860 Democratic Convention provided a textbook illustration of what happens when a party splits. The Democratic Party had been the dominant political party of decades, but that solidarity began to crumble over the volatile issue of whether to introduce slavery in the western territories. Southern Democrats sought to extend slavery into every new state admitted to the union, while many Northern Democrats were opposed. Front-runner Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois hoped to hold the party together by advocating a compromise position that would allow the residents of new states to determine the issue of slavery for themselves. But delegates of seven deep Southern states refused to support him, and attempted to block Douglas’s nomination at the party convention. When that failed, the pro-slavery delegates held their own convention, nominated their own candidate, Vice-President John C. Breckinridge of Kentucky, and endorsed a pro-slavery platform. The split in the Democratic Party led to electoral disaster for both party factions, as it contributed to the rise of the anti-slavery Republican Party and its little-known candidate, Abraham Lincoln. With only brief interruptions, the Republicans would hold the White House until 1912.
- To what extent did growing sectional tension and turmoil concerning slavery affect (or determine) the selection of presidential candidates and the outcome of the election of 1860?
- To what extent did the issue of extension of slavery undermine the unity and lead to the defeat of the Democratic Party in 1860?
- How did the results of the presidential election of 1860 reflect the growing sectional discord and disunion of the United States? Did the outcome of the election of 1860 foment and incite southern secession and the outbreak of the Civil War?
Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas.
Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., visually, quantitatively, as well as in words) in order to address a question or solve a problem
Compare and contrast treatments of the same topic in several primary and secondary sources.
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in the text, including figurative and connotative meanings; analyze the cumulative impact of specific word choices on meaning and tone (e.g., how the language evokes a sense of time and place; how it sets a formal or informal tone).
Explain how supporting questions contribute to an inquiry and how, through engaging source work, new compelling and supporting questions emerge.
Evaluate how historical events and developments were shaped by unique circumstances of time and place as well as broader historical contexts.
Analyze how historical contexts shaped and continue to shape people’s perspectives.
Gather relevant information from multiple sources while using the origin, authority, structure, context, and corroborative value of the sources to guide the selection.
Construct arguments using claims and evidence from multiple sources, while acknowledging the strengths and limitations of the arguments.